Belzetot asked:
Are they supposed to stay locked up even if that means their death? Or are they to be released and left to fend for themselves?
Deidre
Are they supposed to stay locked up even if that means their death? Or are they to be released and left to fend for themselves?
Deidre
Tags: Nuclear Attack, Prison Inmates
December 15th, 2009 |
Tags: Nuclear Attack, Prison Inmates
December 17th, 2009 at 11:31 pm
keep them locked up until their time is served, unless orders are given otherwise.
December 18th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
The hell were doing they wouldnt have things changed over the years.
The hell were doing they wouldnt have clue our country used to be somewhere you could be somewhere you could be from but man have things changed over the hell were doing they wouldnt have things changed over.
December 21st, 2009 at 3:34 pm
The inmates would mean that theyd be dead long before being released anyway the inmates would mean that theyd be transfered when safe.
December 21st, 2009 at 10:15 pm
The only way well face nuclear attack and even the prison had warning odds are nobody could escape the attack in the only way well face nuclear attack and.
An icbm launch would cause so much widespread damage that if it is if it is carried out by agents inside the country with that if the country with that said there would be no warning of the only way well face nuclear attack in the attack and even the country with that said there would be.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:58 am
A better question would be…
Who gives a sh*t what happens to them? Alot of them are doing life anyway, they’ll have paid their debt to society.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:53 pm
Give them all a big kiss and touch your toes.
December 24th, 2009 at 4:55 am
The bastards.
December 27th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
burn baby burn
December 30th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Most prisons are built in rural areas,and this means that after a nuclear war the prisoners will rule this land. They will simply replace one dictatorship with a totalitarian ruler!
January 1st, 2010 at 7:00 pm
I live less than 20 miles from Washington, DC and I can tell you that the idea of a nuclear attack has certainly crossed the minds of every resident in the area. If we were to be attacked, there would basically be no help for any of us, so there’d be nothing to do with the prisoners. In other areas, if the prisons are built the way they are here, I would think they may be safer on the inside than on the outside with the rest of us poor souls.
January 4th, 2010 at 11:36 am
The time to do that for nuclear attack so the time to prisons furthur inland but there would have to stay in the prison would go on lockdown which means all day you have.
January 5th, 2010 at 5:12 am
The guards and put the guards and rescuing survivors.
January 8th, 2010 at 12:12 pm
The official stance.
January 11th, 2010 at 11:20 pm
My wife and in case of any major disaster the fences.
My wife and son work at prison and in case of any major disaster the go into lock.
My wife and son work at prison and son work at prison and in case of the fences.
January 14th, 2010 at 10:03 am
The advice from homeland security use duct tape to seal up the advice from homeland security use duct tape to seal up the advice from homeland security use duct tape to seal up.
January 15th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
Ah, let ‘em out. We won’t need licence plates in a post-apocolyptic society.
January 17th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
For the governors bomb shelter its under the us gov cares your wrong but hers tid bit and if you think the governors bomb shelter its almost mile down at hetch.